New Address as of 10/4/24 — 60 Broad Street, 39th Floor, New York, NY 10004

So, Who Are You Going to Believe…

DJIA: 49,597

So, who are you going to believe… your thinking or your eyes? Oil is up some 50%, Fed cuts unlikely, and inflation looming. Yet the market remains on its AI high. Amidst all this blessed are the technical analysts, pity the poor funnymental guys. It’s not easy to explain. This does remind us all the more of the Vietnam period, when every other week peace was at hand. Then disappointment was met with lower prices. Now good news seems rewarded and bad news is punished less and less. You might even say the market seems to be making the news. Then, too, that’s what markets do. The AI high may not last, but there’s more to the rally than AI and that’s what makes it healthy. In good markets there will always be the better than good, they’re called leaders. Important, however, is adequate participation – the A/Ds have to keep pace. The 2-to-1 up numbers Wednesday were evidence of just that.

One thing that makes this threat of peace a bit more credible is Oil’s reaction. Previously it had ignored such news, but this time has been different. Oil and the stocks are not those of old. Like Gold, which rallied sharply on the news, Oil seems something to be positioned rather than traded. Meanwhile, unless Newton got that gravity thing all wrong, it could be time to sell some Semis and hope you’re wrong, as we like to say. It doesn’t have the momentum of the Semis, but the MAG7 ETF (MAGS – 69) has shaped up rather well. Meanwhile, Software (IGV – 91) is the big laggard, but even there a move above 90 would leave it much improved. What we call the power builders, Quanta Services (PWR – 751), GE Vernova (GEV – 1046) and the like, are good charts to the point of being almost as stretched a the Semis. Communications stocks from NOK (12) to VOD (16) act well, as does the more controversial Blackberry (BB – 6). Nuclear and even the Quantum stocks also seem revived. Leaves you with the feeling there’s more to the market than just Lawrence Welk and the other semi-conductors.

Frank Gretz

Click to download

US Strategy Weekly: An Early Midyear Review

Earnings Revision

In “The Outlook for 2026 – A Year of Great Promise with Risks” (December 24, 2026) we estimated S&P 500 earnings of $315 for 2026 and $350 for 2027 while adding the caveat that we believe our forecasts could prove too conservative.” Our forecasts seemed optimistic at the time, but with first quarter earnings season now more than 65% complete, it is obvious that we were indeed too conservative about earnings growth.  

First quarter earnings results have been stellar. LSEG Data Analytics reported that 83% of reported earnings have exceeded consensus estimates and first quarter year-over-year earnings growth is expected to be nearly 28%. This is nearly 3.5 times the long-term average of 8.1% YOY and the steadfastness of solid and broad-based earnings growth continues to defy the naysayers worried about the negative impact of tariffs in 2025 and high gasoline prices in 2026. Energy prices are likely to lift inflation in coming months, but to Corporate America the offsets to this have been lower taxes on individuals which helps consumption, lower corporate taxes, productivity gains due to AI, and robust capital investment due to a tax law change that allows businesses to deduct the full cost of new investments in the year they are made.

As a result, we are increasing our 2026 estimate from $315 to $330 and our 2027 estimate from $350 to $382. These represent earnings growth rates of 27.5% and 9%, respectively, and are only slightly above the current LSEG IBES consensus estimates of $327.87 and $380.79, respectively. Our revisions also imply that while positive earnings surprises have boosted stocks consistently in recent quarters, these positive surprises will be more difficult to generate as the year advances. In short, the equity market has been driven and supported by excellent earnings growth, but in large part, that has been discounted in prices.

No Target Revision

With the S&P 500 closing at 7259.22, it means the equity market is currently trading at 22 times this year’s earnings and 19 times next year’s earnings. The Outlook for 2026 also stated that The trailing PE multiple of the S&P 500 index has hovered around 26 times for most of the last twelve months and we do not expect this to change. And when we apply a 26 PE multiple to our earnings forecast of $315, we get an S&P 500 target of 8190, which represents a gain of 18%.”

In our view, our original 8190 target is still a good forecast for the S&P 500 but for different reasons. Earnings have been better than expected, but inflation has increased. History shows that higher inflation has been and should be a drag on PE multiples. Nevertheless, a blended earnings estimate (one-third of 2026 plus two-thirds of 2027 earnings) times the current multiple of 22 equals an S&P 500 target of 8170. In sum, the 8170-8190 range appears to be a justifiable target for this year.

Great Promise with Risks

Our theme of “great promise with risks” remains a good description for 2026. The conflict with Iran was not a risk that we anticipated this year, but we were concerned that the Supreme Court could rule against Trump’s tariff policy and have a negative impact on GDP. This has come to pass; however, it appears that there are several ways to implement tariffs, and the administration is finding a work-around. Hopefully this change will be successful, narrow the trade gap, and boost GDP. A strong economy is a must for several reasons, but none more important than it helps a country carry its huge deficit. The key ratio is the debt-to-GDP ratio and debt should not be growing faster than GDP to prevent a debt crisis. At the end of March, the 12-month sum of deficits to GDP was 5.2%, well above the administration’s 3% target, but also down from the frightening 7.2% seen in January 2024. See page 4.

A big concern has been the K-shaped economy and how this could impact consumption. Unfortunately, recent economic data is showing some consumer stress. GDP grew 2.0% (SAAR) in the first quarter of 2026, following a weak 0.5% pace in the fourth quarter due to a record-breaking 43-day government shutdown. See page 3. A major contributor to first quarter GDP was consumer spending, which added 1.1% to growth; however, the largest contributor was personal consumption of services, which added 1.11%, while consumption of goods was slightly negative. The Federal government added 0.6% to GDP, nonresidential investment added 1.4%, inventory accumulation added 0.4% and exports added 1.3%. Residential investment subtracted 0.3% and net exports decreased first quarter GDP by 1.3%. Net exports were the second worst drag on quarterly real GDP growth in four years. See page 4.

In nominal terms, gross domestic product rose 6% in the first quarter, driven largely by personal consumption which increased 5.5% YOY. Gross private domestic product rose a mere 1.6% YOY overall, but investment in equipment and software rose 13.7% and investment in intellectual property increased 10.7%. Nonresidential investment in structures fell 3.9% YOY and residential investment fell 2.9% YOY. It is clear from the data that capital investment has been helping the economy, but big consumer areas like housing and vehicle sales have been weak. Total vehicle sales, including light weight trucks, were 16.3 million units (SAAR), down 1.3% for the month of April and down 7.2% YOY. See page 5.

The ISM manufacturing index was unchanged in April, but six of ten components declined in the month and one of the “positive” components was prices paid to vendors. The ISM nonmanufacturing index fell 0.4 in April to 53.6, but four of its nine components rose in the month and one, prices paid, was unchanged. All in all, the ISM indices displayed a mixed economic picture for April. But note the combination of the two ISM employment indices was 94.4, up 2.1 in April, and while still weak, remains safely within the long-term neutral range. See page 6.

New home sales were better than expected in March, rising 7% for the month to 682,000 annualized units, representing a 3% YOY increase. Sales are still recovering from a sharp decline in January. The price of a new median home was $384,000, down 6% YOY. Housing starts were strong in March, increasing 10.8% YOY and single-family starts rose 8.9% YOY. But housing permits weakened and total permits were down 7.4% YOY and single-family permits were off 7.9% YOY. Rising inflation will make housing less affordable in coming months, and we expect the housing market to remain sluggish in the second quarter. See page 7.

Still Buying Dips Fundamentals remain solid for US equity markets and technical indicators are also supportive. The Russell 2000 index is the best performing index this year with a gain of 14.6%, followed by the Nasdaq Composite up 9%, the S&P 500 up 6%, and the DJIA up 2.6%. A market led by small-capitalization companies is a bullish characteristic. The NYSE cumulative advance/decline line made a record high on April 20, 2026, but is only 325 net advancing stocks away from a new record. This is positive.

Gail Dudack

Click to Download

It’s Biblical… The Geek Shall Inherit the Earth

DJIA: 49,652

It’s Biblical… the geek shall inherit the Earth. And, apparently, space as well. The geek of the week at least last week were the Semis, what’s new? Indeed, the SMH (507) of late gives new meaning to the uselessness of terms like overbought and oversold, those measures known as mean reverting. Studies have found them as much as 80% accurate, the catch being they’re likely to lose 80% of your money. Using the spread between SMH and its 50-day moving average as a guide, buying oversold was a bit early, but lucky it didn’t become worse. The real disaster here was selling early when the ETF became “overbought.” Extreme overbought levels are a good sign as that kind of momentum tends to persist.

Rather than waiting for those mean-reverting measures to live up to their name, best to look to trend-following measures which, as the name suggests, keep you on the right side of good and evil. Choose your poison, as they say, pretty standard here is a 50-day moving average. The SMH recently was some 20% above that 50-day, more than a little stretched by historical standards. Again, a good sign as strength begets strength, but nothing goes straight up. We are certainly not negative on Semiconductors, and if so unlikely brave enough to put it in print. There is a point, though, where Nvidia (NVDA – 200) meets Newton. Who knows where or when, but the Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS – 66)might offer a bit of a template. 

Oil stocks have performed well for obvious reasons, but the nature or depth of the strength seems to have changed. From the knee-jerk reaction buy Exxon (XOM – 155) and Chevron (CVX – 193) the strength has broadened to secondary Producers and more recently to the Oil Equipment names. We have called Transocean (RIG – 7) the canary in the oil patch in the sense that when even that goes, you know, the move is indeed broad. This seems positive and suggests, dare we say it, something fundamental rather than just knee-jerk. The other important change relates to the intangible we have observed in the market itself, the ability to ignore bad news. At the start of all of this any hint of peace sent Oil stocks lower, while recently not so much. 

For all the hoopla over Wednesday night’s earnings, you might call it a tie. In terms of job security Amazon (AMZN – 265) and Alphabet (GOOG – 382), that is, the good charts outperformed the lesser META (612) and MSFT (408).  The MAG Seven ETF seemed to reflect this, opening pretty much unchanged. Perhaps more significantly, the ETF reflects an important positive change. Following a peak back in November and real weakness starting in January, like most of Tech it turned late last month.  And like most of Tech the turn was quite dynamic, barely hesitating at the 50-day.  In keeping with the idea, nothing goes straight up, it is in a minor hesitation or what they call a flag pattern. If indeed it comes out of this to the upside, as we think likely, it should extend the advance. SMH is yet to consolidate in similar fashion but should it, MAGS could prove a template of sorts.

We have viewed the war as a two-part problem. The fury part, possibly including boots on the ground, and the economic part. The Strait of Hormuz remains closed, and Brent hit $120, the highest yet and the Fed seemed to get it as well. At its start the war was supposed to end in a matter of days, Polymarket now puts the Strait reopening at only 50-50 by the end of June.  Oil and the S&P had traded inversely at the start of this, but no longer.   Sure earnings are good, but still. Seems best not to overthink this, rather to stick with the technical basics. Wednesday was not a pretty day looking of course at the better than 2-to-1 down numbers. Bad down days happen even in good markets. It’s the bad up days, up in the averages with poor A/Ds that are the worry. Thursday saw good A/Ds in the rally, but it’s important to keep track here.

Frank D. Gretz

Click to Download

US Strategy Weekly: A UAE Moment

It is Fed week and the consensus view is that there will be no change in monetary policy on Wednesday. We agree. Jerome Powell’s term ends May 15, which means this meeting is apt to be his last as chairman. Still, this press conference could be more interesting than normal, not because of monetary policy but because President Trump has indicated he will fire Powell if he does not leave the Board on May 15. Chairs typically leave the board when their leadership terms end, but Powell has signaled he might defiantly stay on. It would be the first time a former chair remained on the board since 1948. The press is certain to question Powell about his intentions at the press conference this week and we, along with many, will be listening to hear what Chairman Powell has to say.

Nominee Kevin Warsh is also expected to be confirmed on Wednesday and if so, he would be the new Fed Chair at the June 2026 meeting. At Warsh’s confirmation hearing last week, he indicated he plans to bring a number of changes to the Federal Reserve. He suggested that inflation measurements such as “trimmed-mean measures – which lop off the fastest-rising and sharpest-falling prices to get a picture of where most prices are heading – are better gauges of the inflation trend” than many current benchmarks. The Dallas Federal Reserve’s trimmed-mean reading was 2.3% in March, which leads many forecasters to believe Warsh will argue for lower interest rates, if appointed.

But a Warsh appointment could be more consequential than a new benchmark for inflation. During confirmation testimony he argued that interest rates are a better tool for monetary policy than quantitative easing/tightening and he would like to shrink the Fed’s balance sheet. His reasoning is that interest rates impact all Americans, whereas increasing the balance sheet boosts stock prices which has a greater impact on the wealthy than the broader population. He noted that he would also like to revisit the Fed’s 2% inflation target, which could be a major debate for the FOMC. And Warsh signaled that in his view Fed Governors should not give forward guidance about monetary policy or rate-path views. In most cases, these changes would take the Federal Reserve back to its roots and time prior to the Financial Crisis, after which the Fed needed to oversee bank bailouts, implement extreme quantitative easing, and shift to being a more transparent Federal Reserve.

Energy prices rose again this week, not due to Iran or the US, but because the UAE announced it would leave OPEC and OPEC+ on May 1, 2026. The UAE is one of OPEC’s biggest oil producers and this decision severely weakens OPEC’s control over global supplies. Moreover, it reveals a growing discord among the Gulf nations, and between the UAE and Saudi Arabia, in particular. The UAE’s spare capacity allows Abu Dhabi to add extra oil to the market once the Strait of Hormuz is open, and to gain a larger share of the global market. The UAE has also been strengthening its ties with Israel and the US, which makes this move a positive step for President Trump. Separately, the US objected strongly after Iran was selected as one of the 34 vice presidents of the United Nations Nonproliferation Treaty conference on April 27. Unbelievable.

OpenAI has had a difficult week after a Wall Street Journal story indicated there is conflict between Chief Executive Sam Altman and Chief Financial Officer Sara Friar regarding whether revenue can support massive spending on data centers. Simultaneously, Elon Musk took the stand in its high stakes suit against OpenAI. In the suit Musk is seeking $150 billion in damages (with proceeds to go to OpenAI’s charitable arm) after OpenAI betrayed Musk and abandoned the mission to be a nonprofit and benevolent steward of AI for humanity. Since OpenAI hopes to go public in the near future this could be a pivotal week or two for the company and Sam Altman.

But the best news of the week has been earnings. This is the busiest week for first quarter earnings results, and to date, the trend has been stellar. Last week the LSEG IBES 2026 consensus earnings estimate rose $1.60 to $326.78, the 2027 forecast rose $1.17 to $380.37 and the 2028 forecast rose $0.90 to $428.79. In short, the market is trading at 22.0 times the IBES 2026 estimate and 18.9 times the 2027 estimate. The S&P 500 forward earnings yield of 4.7% and dividend yield of 1.2% compare well to a 10-year Treasury bond yield of 4.35%. Plus, the 12-month sum of operating earnings shows a gain of 17.1% YOY, far better than the 75-year average of 8.1% YOY. This has been, and continues to be, an earnings-driven market. See page 7.

Along with good fundamentals, the technical condition of the market is strong. The 25-day up/down volume oscillator is 1.81, up from last week, still neutral, but inching toward an overbought reading of 3.0 or greater. The 10-day average of daily new highs was 347 this week and new lows were 48. This combination of daily new highs above 100 and new lows below 100 raised this indicator from neutral to positive last week. See pages 9 and 10. We remain a buyer of weakness.

One concern we do have is the increasing amount of leverage in the equity market. According to the Office of Financial Research, at the end of 2025, the 10 largest hedge funds in the US increased leverage to 23.9 times equity, the highest since June 2019 (24.64 times). One offset was that medium-sized hedge funds reduced leverage to 10.4 times equity from 12.5 times. In terms of style, event-strategy hedge funds had the largest increase in leverage, up 55% YOY, at the end of 2025. See page 3. Leverage can make the market more volatile and vulnerable to news events in the future.

But most economic news has been solid. Total retail & food services sales rose 4.1% YOY in March, the best pace since September 2025. Excluding motor vehicles and parts, sales rose 5.4% YOY, the best since February 2023. And excluding gas station sales, sales rose 4.1% YOY, down from 4.4% YOY in February. Gasoline station sales were $60.6 billion, the highest since July 2022, and up 18.5% YOY. This is not surprising given that crude oil prices were up 42% YOY in March. Still, nonstore sales were a record $135.4 billion in March, up 9.4% YOY. Real retail sales rose 1.2% YOY, down a bit from 1.4% in February, but matching the 12-month average. See page 4.  

The pending home sales index was 73.7 in March, up from 72.6 in February. Note that seasonally, sales rise in March and November of each year; nevertheless, the index has been stuck in a narrow range for the last four years. Homeownership rates fell slightly in the first quarter, to 65.3% overall, from 65.7% at the end of 2025. This matches the long-term average. Homeownership for those 35 to 44 years of age was the only group to see an increase in ownership in the first quarter, inching up from 60.9% to 61.1%. See page 5. The Conference Board’s consumer confidence index unexpectedly rose from an upwardly revised 92.2 in March to 92.8 in April but remains below the long-term average of 96. The increase was led by a modest improvement in the expectations index, although expectations remain below the recession threshold of 80. The final report for the University of Michigan consumer sentiment index showed April fell to 49.8, down from 53.3 in March, due largely to higher gasoline prices. The median 12-month inflation expectation rose to 4.7% from 3.8%. Expectations led the index lower, falling from 51.7 to 48.1, below the June 2022 low of 50, and lower than the May 1980 low of 51.7. However, keep in mind that sentiment indicators have been despondent and signaling recession since 2022. See page 6.

Gail Dudack

Click to Download

BULLS VS. BEARS

Stocks stumbled in the first quarter of 2026 as the debate shifted from the effects of tariffs on the U.S. and world economies to one of war with Iran. In short order the S&P 500 declined nearly 20% and finished with a 4.3% quarterly loss. We should remember that at the start of the year the U.S. economy and global markets were looking at good economic growth and the prospect of falling interest rates while the market rally of three years was broadening. War, higher oil prices, and a Federal Reserve that has been reluctant to lower interest rates have put this outlook on hold.

While there has been a pessimistic shift in sentiment from where we were when 2026 started, both a bullish and bearish outcome deserve consideration. The bearish case primarily rests on the doubling of oil prices in less than two months and the crippling effect it can have on the world’s economy. Any sustained closure of the Strait of Hormuz—through which 20% of the world’s energy travels—will continue to elevate the price of oil, natural gas, and fertilizer, as well as global shipping costs. This in turn will affect consumer sentiment and spending, and corporate profit margins. The bears will also point to a rise in interest rates which, in part, has been caused by the deterioration in private credit with large sums of investor assets trapped in vehicles of uncertain quality and limited liquidity.

Underlying the bullish argument is that a lot of bad news is already in the market and discounted. Historically, higher oil shocks have ended the business cycle when earnings were decelerating, and that is not the case today. Data would suggest that GDP growth was running at approximately 4.5% in January while EPS growth was 14% year-over-year and accelerating. The bull case also relies heavily on the AI infrastructure buildout which shows  no evidence of softening and may also be accelerating while consumers continue to spend.

In the short term, with Hormuz constraints easing, whether through diplomacy or something else, the markets could be underpricing a fairly significant snapback.

April 2026

Click to Download

FOMO on Steroids Thanks to TACO

DJIA: 49,310

FOMO on steroids thanks to TACO… it’s perfectly clear. What does it say when you can define a market in anagrams? At least they haven’t gotten around to CAPE. That would be Shiller’s Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings Ratio, where both elevated yields and valuations offer a worrisome picture. More friendly is the market trend with the S&P now back on the good side of the 200-day. And despite less than settling news, the VIX is back below 20, a more calm and stock-friendly level. Always important is participation. The averages were down all day on Monday while the advance/decline numbers were positive all day. Granted that’s unusual, and thanks to strength in the multitude of Financial and Oil shares, but how you get there doesn’t much matter. It’s simply important that the average stock gets there.

We have alluded to the market’s ability to ignore bad news, calling the “failure to fail” a positive sign. We are not completely convinced, but something similar could be happening in terms of the Oil stocks. With peace such as it is at hand, we’ve noticed much of the Oil sector doesn’t seem to believe it, or doesn’t seem to care. In other words, the stocks have held together surprisingly well. The non-caring, of course, has to do with the non-ownership here. If you don’t own them, why would you care, and you’re not about to swap your Nvidia (NVDA – 200) for Exxon Mobil (XOM – 151). Meanwhile, it’s still Tech’s world, but don’t tell that to GE Vernova (GEV – 1149) Wednesday, Caterpillar (CAT – 835) Thursday or Bloom Energy (BE – 238) last week. Quanta Services (PWR – 634) is another of these power builders that looks attractive.

Frank D. Gretz

Click to Download

US Strategy Weekly: Happy TACO Tuesday!

President Trump’s two-week ceasefire with Iran, initially scheduled to end Tuesday, April 21, 2026, was just extended minutes ago at the request of Pakistan to allow Iran to submit a unified peace proposal to the US. We doubt that Iran can produce a unified proposal. Leadership is in disarray and if they could produce a unified proposal, we doubt it would be one that the US could accept. This leaves financial markets in limbo.

Uncertainty is a constant for investors, but this time the uncertainty regarding the Iranian conflict has immediate implications for investors and the fallout has and will continue to impact markets around the globe. In recent days, oil prices tumbled and equity prices rose to record highs in anticipation that peace talks would be successful. This must now be reassessed. The near-term risk of reversals in both trends is high, and we would not make big investment decisions in the days ahead.

Iranian leaders are patient and believe they will win. They are not democratically elected and therefore do not need to please the Iranian people. They believe they have time on their side as compared to their elected adversaries. But in our view, the request from Pakistan to wait for a unified proposal is a thinly veiled stall tactic that will not last for long. Many world leaders have fallen prey to the media’s message of TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out) and believe President Trump will compromise or back down from his demand of no nuclear weapons. But this is foolish. At present, Iranian leadership feels the Strait of Hormuz is their golden bargaining chip; however, the US blockade of their blockade has turned that asset into a liability. Iran relies on the strait for both its necessities and supplies (such as the sanctioned Iranian cargo ship Touska seized in the Gulf of Oman by the US and carrying “dual use” cargo after traveling through Chinese ports) as well as the way to export its oil (their main source of revenue). The US is preventing any ships from docking or leaving Iranian ports. In addition, the Iranian blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has inspired countries to find new sources of petroleum and fuel. Countries like Saudi Arabia are finding alternative ways to export oil. Eventually, the Iranian blockade may backfire.

Iran, i.e., the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), believes it can endure economic and military pressure longer than the United States. And unfortunately, the IRGC is emboldened by statements such as the one from the International Energy Agency (IEA) opining that this conflict is creating the worst energy crisis ever faced by the world. (Someone clearly did not live in the US during the Oil Embargo of the 1970s!) However, President Trump has demonstrated that he does not make idle threats. If Iran proves to be unable or unwilling to negotiate in good faith, we believe the odds of renewed bombing is extremely high. Again, we would suggest not making big decisions this week.

Meanwhile, the ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel has been breached by Hezbollah, just ahead of US-mediated talks between the Israeli and Lebanese governments scheduled for later this week. Once again, this creates uncertainty because Israel welcomes any excuse to continue to unarm Hezbollah by force.

Sock Puppet

In other news, Kevin Warsh, nominee to chair the Federal Reserve, appeared before the Senate Banking Committee for his confirmation hearing. And despite being labeled a “sock puppet” by Senator Elizabeth Warren, Warsh appears headed for confirmation. His testimony included interesting comments including monetary policy independence is essential, reforms are necessary for monetary policy and Fed communications. In terms of policy, Warsh noted that interest rate levels impact all people in the US whereas increasing the Fed’s balance sheet benefits only stockholders and the wealthy. He also implied that Federal Reserve Board members should not be too transparent in terms of policy direction. (We agree! A transparent Federal Reserve inspires greater speculative activity, and this has been rampant in recent years.)

Economic News

According to the April Beige Book, the economy advanced modestly as the first quarter of 2026 ended with eight of the 12 Federal Reserve districts reporting modest growth. Atlanta, Cleveland, and Richmond were among the best performing regions with New York reporting a small decline in activity. Most importantly, the report made it clear that the job market is best described as a “low fire, low hire” environment.

The NAR pending home sales index rose from 72.1 in February to 73.7 in March but continues to languish below 2025 levels in all regions except the South. There was modest improvement in the Northeast and South, but sales fell in the Midwest and West. Builder confidence for newly built single-family homes fell 4 points in April to 34, the lowest level since September 2025. Current sale conditions fell 4 points to 37, sales expectations in the next six months were down 7 points to 42 and traffic of potential buyers fell 3 points to 22. Overall, the residential real estate market remains in the doldrums. See page 3.

Retail sales, when not-seasonally adjusted, usually jump in December — for holiday sales — and in March – after a post-holiday spending slump. March 2026 retail sales increased nearly 16% month-over-month (MOM) and 4.5% year-over-year (YOY). Retail sales excluding motor vehicles & parts jumped 15.5% MOM and 6.3% YOY. Motor vehicles & parts sales soared 17.7% MOM but fell 2.3% YOY. See page 4. March’s largest increases were seen in gasoline stations where sales increased 18.3% YOY and nonstore retailers where sales increased 13.2% YOY. However, clothing, electronics and appliances, building materials, and sporting goods sales were also strong. In sum, as noted in the Beige Book, the economy demonstrated steady growth in the first quarter.

Fundamentals and Technicals

The LSEG IBES consensus earnings estimates continue to rise and for 2026 increased $1.45 this week to $325.18. The 2027 forecast rose $1.26 to $379.20 and the 2028 forecast rose $2.10 to $427.91. This means the S&P 500 is currently trading at 21.7 times this year’s earnings, 18.6 times 2027 earnings and 16.5 times 2028 earnings. The equity market is not as cheap as it was in late March, but these PE multiples are reasonable valuations even with the equity market just below all-time highs. See pages 5-6. Year-to-date the Dow Jones Transportation Average leads all indices with a gain of 37.9%, followed by the Russell 2000 with a gain of 11.4%, the Dow Jones Utility Average with a gain of 6.1%, the Nasdaq Composite up 4.4%, the S&P 500 up 3.2%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 2.3%. Not surprisingly, the NYSE cumulative advance/decline line hit a record high on April 20, 2026 and the 10-day average of new daily highs jumped to 315. These are all solid signs for the market in the longer term. See pages 7-8.

Gail Dudack

Click to Download

From Intangible… to Tangible

DJIA: 48,579

From intangible… to tangible. The market had shown an ability to ignore bad news, a failure to fail as we call it. While not quantifiable, we have always found it a hopeful sign and in this case it seems so. Last week and this one so far have signs that indeed are quantifiable. How well rallies begin usually says a lot. For the NASDAQ 100, stocks above their 10-day average have cycled from less than 30% to more than 70%, a change with very positive implications. The drop in the VIX or CBOE Volatility Index is another positive sign. Everyone thinks a spike there is important and it is, but its subsequent decline says the panic is over. A spike in various put/call ratios also is indicative of a panic now passed. And, more basically, the S&P is back on the good side of its 200-day moving average.

Most impressive in all of this was Monday’s market. Up 300 with 2-to-1 advancing issues is always a good day. Doing so after negative news and a 500-point down opening seems particularly impressive. It had both the intangible of ignoring bad news, and the tangible of good numbers. Given the ongoing poor news background, it almost seems difficult to explain. Yet, it is in its way quite simple. The market is a discounting mechanism and when the market discounts something it doesn’t usually keep doing so. That said, we don’t want to get too far ahead here. Based on our vast military experience as a wheel and track vehicle mechanic in the 7th Regiment on Park Avenue, we wonder if we may not yet see boots on the ground. That would likely cause another downside jolt but also another buying opportunity.

 Meanwhile, it’s Tech’s world―the rest seem just visiting. That was the look at the end of last week. Interestingly, a stock like Broadcom (AVGO – 399) was one of the worst of those charts a couple of weeks ago, and now is among the best. The group is not just good, it seems to be improving. The dark side of Tech, the Software stocks, had their best day in some time on Monday. Down the most often turns to up the most but still, that move seems a pleasant surprise. When even the bad stop going down, that’s not bad. To keep some perspective, Oil stocks are unlikely yet over loved or over owned. And after their quick 15% drop from a one-year high, historically they’ve proven a buy.  And these days, Oil is a bit of a hedge.

Have you seen the UFO? Not the one you see after a couple of martinis, the Procure Space ETF (UFO – 55).  Space is hot and has been for a while, but another obvious push could come from the SpaceX IPO. We understand EchoStar (SATS – 133) participates there and just recently, Amazon (AMZN – 250) and Globalstar (GSAT – 80) cut a deal. Most of the charts here are good, as you might imagine just from a look at the UFO chart itself. We still like the Power Builders like GE Vernova (GEV – 979), and Bloom Energy (BE – 210) lived up to its name Tuesday on another deal with Oracle (ORCL – 179). Power is not the only issue facing AI. There also seems to be a communications problem. Apparently 5G is a few Gs short of what is needed. We have liked Nokia (NOK – 10) for a while, and to name drop, they have a deal with Nvidia (NVDA – 198). Ericsson (ERIC – 12) also looks good.

We have thought of all of this as a two-part problem. The first being the fury, both in terms of the war and the market. That seems discounted. The second is the economic consequences, yet unknown but surely consequential. Also, we start here with rich P/Es and high yields, not a positive combination. The market’s recovery has been impressive. It might be explained by a combination of FOMO and TACO, to drive our compliance guy nuts. The “fear of missing out” in this case is on steroids. It follows last year’s post Liberation Day rally when “Trump always chickens out.” That’s a memory that’s hard to forget. The stock market these days is much different from those most remember. They like to call it momentum, but think of it as extrapolation — what happened today will happen tomorrow.

Frank D. Gretz

Click to Download

US Strategy Weekly: Russell versus the MAG 7

The first few hours of the US blockade of the Strait of Hormuz — with US warships located outside the strait in the Gulf of Oman — resulted in only eight vessel crossings. This was touted as a disaster by some politicians since it is a mere fraction of the 130 per day that was typical a few weeks ago. However, war-risk insurance costs remain high, according to insurance experts, and this will take time to change. Nevertheless, the US blockade may be less about opening the strait to global commerce and more about keeping Iran from exporting oil to China and other friendly nations. In short, the blockade may be meant to pressure Iran economically, to stop Iran from exporting oil, and to reduce Iran’s ability to fund more weapons. Financial markets appeared to understand this strategy better than news sources and WTI light crude oil futures remained relatively unchanged at $91.48 but equities rallied and regained all of their year-to-date losses.

The year-to-date performances of various equity indices is revealing. From best to worst these are: the Dow Jones Transportation Average up 22.5%, the Dow Jones Utilities Average up 9.6%, Russell 2000 index up 9.0%, the Wilshire 5000 composite up 2.25%, the S&P 500 index up 1.8%, the Nasdaq Composite index up 1.7%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 1.0%. The huge advance in the Dow Jones Transportation Average appears counterintuitive given the recent increase in fuel costs, but this benchmark now includes many logistics and trucking firms that have been helped by a healthy economy. Plus, talk of a possible merger between American Airlines Group Inc. (AAL — $12.13) and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL – $97.20) helped to boost the index this week. Utility stocks are up this year due to an aging infrastructure coupled with a massive power demand from AI data centers.

The 9% gain in the Russell 2000 index is the most interesting to us. We believe this performance reflects the resilience of the US economy and the fact that this index is heavily weighted to smaller domestically based companies versus the large international companies that dominate the S&P 500, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite. As we noted several weeks ago, while most analysts focus on the risk of inflation due to higher energy costs, they miss the point that the higher cost of oil, which is based in US dollars, is a bigger burden to non-dollar, non-oil-producing countries than it is to Americans. In short, we worry less about the US and more about global growth. In our view, the US is the global economic leader and therefore, a relative safe haven for investors. Equally important is the fact that some of the “magnificent seven” stocks have recently encountered skepticism that the massive investment in AI infrastructure will continue and/or reap the financial benefits needed to support sky high valuations. As a result, they have been the underperformers this year. The good news is that valuations have become more reasonable. And from an historical perspective, it is bullish that this group of stocks has encountered skepticism. The alternative would have been a mania for the MAG 7, a roaring stock market bubble, followed by an inevitable bear market!

What we are Watching: Bank Earnings

In terms of 2026 price performance, the financial sector has been one of the worst performing sectors this year due to a variety of issues including President Trump’s urging to banks to cap credit card interest rates at 10%, a weak housing market, a sluggish auto loan market, and the risk of another wave of inflation in 2026. Risk of a crisis in the private credit market has also weighed heavily on the financial sector. But since banking is at the heart of all economic cycles, it is important to have solid leadership from this sector to support a healthy bull market cycle. For all these reasons, first quarter earnings season will be important and enlightening for the banks. Investors should watch not only for earnings but to see if loan loss reserves increase, which we expect will materialize due to recent defaults in software company loans. To date, earnings reports from Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC – $81.70), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM – $311.12), and Citigroup Inc. (C – $129.58) revealed strong trading revenue across the board, but most companies had a cautious view emphasizing future economic risks. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS – $909.63) reported record revenue in equity trading but weakness in fixed income, currencies, and commodities. More bank earnings, including Bank of America (BAC – $53.35), will be released later this week. Price action in these banks has been mixed in response to earnings releases; yet we believe the financial sector may be poised to become a relative outperforming sector if the Iranian conflict gets resolved. This would be bullish for all equities.

Technical Indicators Improve

There was some improvement in our technical indicators this week, in particular the 10-day average of daily new highs was 163 and the 10-day average of daily new lows fell to 90. This combination of daily new highs above 100 and new lows below 100 shifts this indicator from neutral to positive. The last time the NYSE cumulative advance/decline line made a new high was on February 26, 2026, but it is currently a net 1,865 advances away from making a new record. The possibility of a new high in this indicator, coupled with the outperformance of smaller capitalization stocks is favorable. In sum, we remain a buyer on weakness. See page 10.

Inflation Insights

Inflation picked up in March as expected and headline CPI jumped from 2.4% YOY to 3.3% YOY. Nevertheless, core CPI remained relatively unchanged, inching up from 2.5% YOY to 2.6% YOY. Note that both CPI indices remain below the long-term average of 3.5% YOY. PPI indices were more directly impacted by soaring oil prices and the PPI for finished goods jumped from 1.6% YOY in February to 4.1% in March. Core PPI for finished goods remained unchanged at 3.7% YOY. The PPI final demand index, the most watched index, rose from 3.4% YOY to 4.0% YOY. This puts all these indices above the long-term average of 3% YOY. See page 3.

There is a growing disparity between core PPI and core CPI at the moment, and this is a relatively rare occurrence. Similar disparities occurred in 1973-1974 during the Oil Embargo, in 2008-2009 during the financial crisis, and in 2022-2023 when the Biden-Harris administration focused on reducing fossil fuel reliance, hindered domestic oil & gas production, and paused new LNG export terminals. History shows that the CPI is heavily influenced by the PPI index but does not always have the same extremes. A chart combining CPI, PPI, and WTI oil prices is important. See page 4. Although the high price of fuel is a big negative for households, note that the current 66% YOY increase in WTI prices is not that unusual and not as extreme as the March 2021 to March 2022 period when oil prices rose 237% YOY as of April 2021 and averaged gains of 97% YOY for the subsequent 12 months! The NFIB small business optimism index fell to 95.8 in March, matching the low seen in April 2025, and sliding below the long-term average of 98.0. The uncertainty index rose to 92.0, the highest since the 100 seen in September 2025. There has been an historical correlation between small business optimism and the inverse of the unemployment rate. Since early 2023, the unemployment rate has been slowly rising, and small business optimism has been slowly falling. In other words, the trend is not new or extreme, but it is worrisome. Our biggest concern for 2026 continues to be weakness in the job market. The next employment report is scheduled for Friday, May 8, 2026. See page 5.

Gail Dudack

Click to Download

There’s Technical Data… and Technical Intangibles

There’s technical data… and technical intangibles. Both matter, and in this market, it was the latter that caught our attention. How could things look so dire, yet the market hold together? How could this news-driven market suddenly seem to ignore bad news? And to be clear, the market has done more than just hold together. Being up 160 Dow points Monday―the day before oblivion―is one thing. Being up with a plurality of advancing stocks is another. The intangible here is what we used to call “the failure to fail.” This market had every reason to go down, yet did not. We know tomorrow is another day, but this seems worthy of note. It’s hard to say all the bad has been discounted, but maybe at least the fury part? When the market ignores bad news, it’s good to remember ― it’s the market that makes the news.

The conflict and its consequences are just that, a two-part problem. It reminds us of first aid training from the Boy Scouts or the army, is there a difference? First, you start the breathing and then stop the bleeding, in this case stop the fighting. Then you treat the wound and treat for shock, in this case the consequences of the fighting. If the fighting is indeed over, what does that mean for the shortage of jet fuel? And what does that mean, in turn, for Airline earnings?   Stocks sell at fair value, whatever that is, once on their way to more overvalued, and again on their way in turn to more undervalued. It’s the trend counts.

Up some 1300 Dow points with 5-to-1 advance/decline numbers, it’s hard to call Wednesday a bad day, and we won’t.  Literally, however, the day was over in the first five minutes, the rest spent flatlining.  Both the S&P and NASDAQ 100 went nowhere all day and closed slightly lower. Even the Semis, where some stocks had impressive moves, on the whole simply flatlined. It’s not to say this is necessarily bad, it is to say this is the way it is in these news driven markets. The money is being made at night rather than during the day. For a long-term investor, of course, who cares when the money is made as long as it’s being made. They say never buy an up opening in a bad market, apparently it’s even hard to buy an up opening in a good market.

Frank D. Gretz

Click to Download