Trade fears began to pummel the equity markets this week after President Trump indicated he will impose a deadline of this Friday for a trade agreement with China or tariffs will increase from 10% to 25% on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods. According to Reuters this shift in tone came after US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer informed President Trump that Chinese negotiators were seeking to deal with policy changes through administrative and regulatory actions, not through changes to Chinese law as previously agreed. A person close to the negotiations indicated that under China’s system — in which the Communist Party has ultimate control — changes in law are the only way to get even a small measure of certainty on compliance. From this perspective, it should not be surprising that President Trump is playing hard-ball with China. A weak or ineffective trade deal with China may not be any better than no deal at all.
China versus US
With a trade deal now in doubt, stock and oil prices declined and bond prices rose. As seen on page 16, over the last five trading days the SPX fell 1.4% but the Shanghai Composite index sank 5.2%, or nearly four times as much as the SPX. The DJIA suffered a 473.39 point, or 1.8% drop on Tuesday, its largest one-day sell-off since January 3 and the SPX fell 1.7%. Nevertheless, the broad indices are less than 2.5% away from their record highs and the current declines are barely visible in long-term charts. In our opinion, the disparity in the performance of the Chinese and the US equity markets is important since it is a reflection of the potential impact tariffs are likely to have on the respective domestic economies.
Given the drama seen in the markets this week we thought it best to bullet point some thoughts:
In sum, we do not believe a failed trade negotiation with China will trigger a substantial decline in US equities. Conversely, a successful trade agreement should propel the indices back to their recent highs. There is no change in our SPX 3110 target for this year and we continue to believe our target could prove to be conservative.
Strong Economic Numbers with a Few Weak Undertones
Not only was April’s 3.6% unemployment rate the lowest level reported since December 1969, but the 1.9 million people who applied for unemployment insurance in the last five weeks was the lowest since the 1.8 million seen in January 1970. See page 3. These are signs of a strengthening job market. Non-supervisory hourly earnings rose an inflation-adjusted 1.9% YOY in April, well above the 10-year average of 0.8% YOY. Inflation-adjusted weekly earnings were up a similar 1.6% YOY and were also above the 10-year average of 0.8% YOY. See page 4. Still, April’s confidence indices remain below peak 2018 levels. Confidence may improve as households experience the benefit of rising wages and modest inflation. The sum of inflation and the unemployment rate is often called the Misery Index, and this index was 5.2% in April, the lowest since September 2015’s 5.0%. See page 5.
The preliminary estimate for 1Q19 GDP growth was 3.2%, and despite a government shut-down and poor weather, it was substantially better than the 2.2% pace seen in 4Q18. This improvement came despite a slowdown in consumer spending which was not a surprise given recent retail sales numbers. Inventory accumulation increased as expected since inventories declined at yearend. Growth in fixed investment slowed. Real disposable income growth slowed to 2.4% from 4.3%. The saving rate rose to 7%, from 6.8% in the fourth quarter. However, we found the improvement in the trade deficit to be the most encouraging aspect of the quarter. See page 6.
The current expansion is only a few months from becoming the longest in history, yet this economy is not showing the excesses typical of an aging cycle such as rising inflation or gross private domestic investment generating 19% or more of GDP growth. See page 7. In fact, we see pockets of weakness. A 3-month average of retail sales, adjusted for inflation, rose 1.1% in April, the slowest pace since emerging from a recession in 2009. Residential investment rose 0.6% YOY in 1Q19, the lowest since 2011; and as a result, residential investment represented only 3.76% of GDP growth. See page 8.
A number of economists are fearing there will be higher inflation and weaker profit margins due to rising wages. However, we disagree. The employment cost index (ECI) in the first quarter showed total compensation rose 2.8% YOY and wages declined from 3.1% YOY in 4Q18 to 2.9% in 1Q19. Private industry compensation costs were even milder at 2.7% YOY versus government total compensation costs at 3.0% YOY. Union worker total compensation costs rose 3.4% YOY in 1Q19 versus the 2.7% seen for non-union workers. However, we are focused on the private industry costs of 2.7% YOY which are quite benign when compared to the first quarter CPI rise of 1.9% YOY. See page 9. All in all, we believe the US economy is demonstrating solid growth but is still growing below its potential.
The recent sell-off is barely visible in the charts seen on page 11 and most indices remain near all-time highs. However, the Russell 2000 has been lagging and is the only index with a down-trending 200-day moving average. This underperformance is in stark contrast to our NYSE cumulative advance decline line which recorded a new high on May 3. We will be monitoring the RUT during market weakness and as it tests its 200-day moving average. Holding above this level would be an encouraging sign of strength. The 25-day up/down volume oscillator is at 0.06 (preliminarily) this week despite the recent sell-off. The oscillator made a two-day overbought reading on April 11-12 and April’s reading followed a long 25-consecutive-day overbought reading in January through March. The 10-day average of daily new highs is 189 and above the 100 per day level defined as bullish. The A/D line made a new record high on May 3, 2019 and is also positive. We remain long-term bullish.
“Overweight”: Overweight relative to S&P Index weighting
“Neutral”: Neutral relative to S&P Index weighting
“Underweight”: Underweight relative to S&P Index weighting
This report has been written without regard for the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient, and should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment. The report is published solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. The securities described herein may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. The report is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as being accurate, nor is it a complete statement or summary of the securities, markets or developments referred to in the report. Any opinions expressed in this report are subject to change without notice and Dudack Research Group division of Wellington Shields & Co. LLC. (DRG/Wellington) is under no obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. Options, derivative products, and futures are not suitable for all investors, and trading in these instruments is considered risky. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results, and yield from securities, if any, may fluctuate as a security’s price or value changes. Accordingly, an investor may receive back less than originally invested. Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value, price or income of any security or related instrument mentioned in this report.
DRG/Wellington relies on information barriers, such as “Chinese Walls,” to control the flow of information from one or more areas of DRG/Wellington into other areas, units, divisions, groups or affiliates. DRG/Wellington accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of the use of all or any part of this report.
The content of this report is aimed solely at institutional investors and investment professionals. To the extent communicated in the U.K., this report is intended for distribution only to (and is directed only at) investment professionals and high net worth companies and other businesses of the type set out in Articles 19 and 49 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2001. This report is not directed at any other U.K. persons and should not be acted upon by any other U.K. person. Moreover, the content of this report has not been approved by an authorized person in accordance with the rules of the U.K. Financial Services Authority, approval of which is required (unless an exemption applies) by Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
©2018. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or distributed in any manner without the written permission of Dudack Research Group division of Wellington Shields & Co. LLC. The Company specifically prohibits the re-distribution of this report, via the internet or otherwise, and accepts no liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect.
Contact Andrea Costello, Head of Research Sales for additional information (212) 320-2046 or Andrea@DudackResearchGroup.com
PLEASE NOTE: Unless otherwise stated, the firm and any affiliated person or entity 1) either does not own any, or owns less than 1%, of the outstanding shares of any public company mentioned, 2) does not receive, and has not within the past 12 months received, investment banking compensation or other compensation from any public company mentioned, and 3) does not expect within the next three months to receive investment banking compensation or other compensation from any public company mentioned. The firm does not currently make markets in any public securities.