US Strategy Weekly: First 100 Days

Reuters News posted a recent headline that caught our attention as well as that of many other readers: “Stocks set for worst 100 day start since Nixon as Trump injects semi-permanent uncertainty.” The writer may not know this, but this headline is comparing the current global economic environment to that seen in early 1973. The first quarter of 1973 was the initiation of an infamous oil embargo when the Arab world, organized as OPEC, imposed a ban on oil shipments to the US and other Western nations. This ban led to soaring oil prices, mile-long gasoline lines, and a long-lasting inflationary cycle that resulted in the CPI hitting 12.2% YOY in November 1974. It was also the beginning of the Watergate scandal which led to President Nixon resigning in 1974. Of course, this reporter is only looking at the decline in the S&P 500 and trying to make a point. But like any comparison, it is hollow unless it is put into an economic and historical perspective.

In 1973, the oil embargo and the Watergate scandal were not problems President Nixon could truly control and the uncertainty of both issues, one economic and the other political, lasted more than 12 months, or as the reporter noted, led to a “semi-permanent uncertainty.”

We do not believe the current environment qualifies as semi-permanent uncertainty. The current tariff negotiations are under the management of the President and his Cabinet, and it is likely that a number of important trade agreements will be announced over the course of the next 100 days. When this occurs, tariffs are apt to come down or be eliminated. Although China is the main target of the tariffs, China has already waived the 125% tariff on ethane imports from the United States imposed earlier this month. It was one of a group of products that have been granted exemptions but has not been front page news. And in terms of 1973 and oil prices, oil prices are currently going down, not up. And as we saw from 2020 to 2022, rising oil prices are inflationary and become a tax on consumers and corporations in a variety of ways. The exact opposite should be true in coming quarters. In sum, after reading this Reuters report we see little comparison to this quarter and 1973 and became more optimistic about the overall economy and stock market.

Our growing optimism may seem unwarranted given the current status of sentiment indicators. See page 3. Nevertheless, in the past few months there has been a significant discrepancy between soft data (sentiment), which shows extremely weak consumer confidence, and hard data (economic activity) which shows solid employment and consumption. The media has been highlighting the “recessionary” levels in sentiment, and we have been worried that a recession could be manufactured by a media that appears laser-focused on the negatives. However, we expect this disparity between hard and soft data will be resolved in coming months. With that in mind, it makes this week’s employment report for March an important data point. In time, sentiment and economic trends are likely to converge. But in our view, sentiment could rebound quickly if (or once) the administration announces a series of trade deals and Congress passes “the big beautiful bill” promised by President Trump.

Note on page 3 that Conference Board confidence indices are currently lower than they were at the October 2022 low. The trigger for the 2022 low was high inflation and the Fed’s late, but aggressive, interest rate hikes. But as we just indicated, oil prices are now falling and current Federal Reserve policy is tilted dovish, therefore, sentiment seems too pessimistic.

In terms of the economy, recent releases point to a still sluggish housing sector and March data was in line. Existing home sales fell 2.4% YOY in March to 4.02 million units and the median price of an existing home rose 2.7% YOY to $403,700. New home sales increased a healthy 6% YOY, but prices fell 8% YOY to $403,600. This pricing is unusual since new home construction is typically priced higher than existing homes, so this price drop in new homes is interesting and suggests home prices are coming down further. Both existing and new home inventories rose in March, but healthy new home sales led to months of supply falling from 8.9 months to 8.3 months. Existing home inventories, on the other hand, rose from 3.5 to 4.0 months. At the end of the quarter homeownership fell from 65.7% to 65.1% with the largest homeownership decline seen in the Midwest. See page 4.

Nearly a third of the S&P components will be reporting first quarter earnings results this week and next week’s consensus estimate changes could be important in terms of defining an earnings trend for the year. But last week, the S&P Dow Jones consensus earnings estimate for calendar 2025 fell $2.83 to $261.40 and the 2026 estimate fell $2.67 to $299.61. The LSEG IBES estimate for 2025 fell $1.87 to $264.15 and the 2026 estimate declined by $1.92 to $302.19. The LSEG IBES estimate for 2027 is $341.00, down $1.43. In short, earnings forecasts continue to fall dramatically. See page 6.

From a valuation perspective this means the S&P 500 trailing 4-quarter operating earnings multiple, after reaching a recent intra-month low of 20.7 times earnings in early April, is now 23.1 times and above both the 5-year and 50-year averages of 21.5 and 16.8 times, respectively. When using recently lowered 2026 S&P Dow Jones estimates, the 12-month forward PE multiple is now 18.45 times and back above its long-term average of 17.9 times; but when added to inflation of 2.4%, the sum comes to 20.85, which remains within the normal range of 15.0 to 24.1. This is a positive. See page 5.

Although most economic releases indicate a stable and resilient US consumer and economy, there are a few worrisome issues. The dollar continues to trade below $100 for the first time in three years and this will make imports expensive and exports difficult. In short, dollar weakness could be a bigger negative for US trade than Trump’s proposed tariffs. And since there have been liquidity issues in the Treasury markets, we are watching the SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK – $95.27) for signs of stress in the fixed income arena. JNK fell to an intraday low of $90.41 in early April, which was a concern; however, it has rebounded smartly and is now testing the 200-day moving average at $96.03. This is good news. See page 7. From a technical perspective, after impressive rallies off the April lows, the indices are now challenging their 50-day moving averages. These averages are directly above recent closing prices at levels of 5,613 in the S&P 500, 41,501 in the DJIA, 17,631 in the Nasdaq Composite, and 2,021 in the Russell 2000. See page 8. It will be a test of strength to see if these first lines of resistance can be bettered in coming days. We expect the 200-day moving average lines to be important resistance in coming months, or until second quarter earnings season and the reconciliation bill is passed by Congress, later this year. Nonetheless, the recent improvement in breadth statistics is impressive and the S&P and DJIA are now less than 10% below their record highs. The Nasdaq Composite and Russell 2000 are 13.5% and 19.1%, respectively, below their record highs. The 10-day average of daily new highs is 59 this week and new lows are averaging 61. This combination of daily new highs and lows below 100 is neutral, but a big improvement from last week when daily new lows averaged 342. On April 11, the 10-day new low index (823) was the highest since the September-October 2022 low (882). While we expect a trading range market to continue for several more weeks or months, the comparisons between current technical indicators and those at the 2022 low suggest a much higher market by year end.

Gail Dudack

Click to Download